How digital innovation can inform RWE-led decision-making

Leveraging RWE for product decision-making
Companies can use this RWE to define the market for their product and carve out a niche by demonstrating differentiated or superior outcomes to a competitor product in some conditions or in specific subpopulations. For example, if a product in the oncology space is used as a second- or third-line therapy, a company might use RWE showing better survival or better quality of life to demonstrate an advantage over a traditional therapy.
While randomized controlled clinical trials are the gold standard for evaluating safety and effectiveness, they are tested on a limited population. Once approved and a much broader population begins using those products, new information comes to light that can be leveraged by the company and by payers in different markets.
RWE offers insights into the effectiveness of medications, especially for populations that are often underrepresented in clinical trials, such as children, the elderly, and individuals with comorbidities. Moreover, in some disease areas, traditional clinical trials are neither feasible nor ethical, such as for patients with life-threatening or rare conditions.1

Making sense of RWE with digital tools
For their part, payers are expected to use digital tools, such as AI, to assess product data in order to inform coverage decisions, product reimbursement, and patient management. Digital tools such as an interactive dashboard or web page can provide payers with not just the data but an analysis of what that means, perhaps even allowing them to drill down into specific geographies or patient populations versus just having tables of data to sift through. This could potentially enable decisions to be made in a more informed manner.
There is also movement toward ingesting and managing vast amounts of data earlier in the clinical development cycle, even before there is evidence or claims data about the specific intervention, such as to identify rare disease patients. This could help to inform which indications a company might pursue, inform product development, support communication with the regulatory authorities, and give payers insight into how much they potentially might pay for a product depending on how many patients have a rare disease or cancer subtype.3,4

Overcoming the barriers to leveraging RWE
Regulatory authorities are working to provide greater clarity on RWE. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued its report on an RWE framework to support decision-making, assessing experience with using RWD to support regulatory decisions.5 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued multiple guidances on the use of RWE and RWD to support regulatory oversight.6 Nevertheless, there remains a need for more guidance around how digital tools can and should be used to analyze patient data.
Payers and health technology assessment (HTA) bodies are also starting to put greater focus on RWE and the use of tools such as AI for evidence generation. The United Kingdom’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published a real-world evidence framework in light of the important role RWD plays in understanding how care is delivered, patients’ experience, and the wider impact of interventions.7
NICE has also issued a position statement on the use of AI in evidence generation, highlighting both the important role AI will likely play in helping to inform NICE decisions as well as concerns around appropriateness, transparency, and trustworthiness.8 In its review, NICE states: “Real-world data may lend itself increasingly to the use of AI approaches as accessibility and standardisation of large datasets reflecting routine care and real-world populations improve. AI approaches have several potential roles for supporting real-world evidence across numerous stages of evidence generation.”
McKinsey recently explored the important role AI could play in reimbursement by lowering medical and administrative costs for payers, noting, however, that few so far have seized the opportunity to leverage AI.9
Advancing the goals of RWE in 2025
Despite the uncertainty, use of RWE and AI to enable payers to make better-informed decisions is gaining traction and is likely to see greater interest in the year ahead.
Both payers and pharmaceutical companies are likely to commit to greater collaboration or openness, taking advantage of digital solutions such as cloud-support platforms to share data. This would allow pharmaceutical companies to gain access to large databases in return for letting health systems see how they are using that data, and possibly even results from the use of that data. Furthermore, providing tools that could help smaller health systems, such as regional hospitals, gain on-the-ground insights and make informed formulary decisions for their patient populations. Such a move would go a long way to supporting access to medications for often under-served patients.
About our experts:
Derek Swiger, PharmD, MS is an Assistant Director with Cencora’s Global Consulting Services Digital Innovation team and serves as the Digital Innovation Business Partner for the Market Access and Healthcare Consulting Value Delivery Center.
Ryan Fiano, Ph.D., MPH is an Assistant Director on the Real-World Evidence team at Cencora. He provides expertise in health economics and outcomes research studies through knowledge of data management, research design, data analysis and interpretation, biostatistics, machine learning, and scientific writing.


References:
1. A systematic review of real-world evidence (RWE) supportive of new drug and biologic license application approvals in rare diseases, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, March 2024. https://ojrd.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13023-024-03111-2
2. Real-world evidence’s evolution into a true end-to-end capability, Deloitte Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/articles/us175115_chs_rwe-report/DI_CHS_RWE.pdf
3. Use of Real-World Evidence to Drive Drug Development Strategy and Inform Clinical Trial Design, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2021. https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.2480
4. Real‐world evidence to support regulatory submissions: A landscape review and assessment of use cases, Clin Transl Sci., Aug 2024. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11295294/#:~:text=Overall%2C%20RWE%20is%20utilized%20in,RWE%20in%20regulatory%20decision%E2%80%90making.
5. Real-world evidence framework to support EU regulatory decision-making, EMA/HMA, Feb 2023 to Feb 2024. https://www.ema.europa.eu/system/files/documents/report/real-world-evidence-framework-support-eu-regulatory-decision-making-2nd-report-exper_en_0.pdf
6. Real-World Evidence, FDA. https://www.fda.gov/science-research/science-and-research-special-topics/real-world-evidence
7. NICE real-world evidence framework, June 2022. Overview | NICE real-world evidence framework | Guidance | NICE
8. Use of AI in evidence generation: NICE position statement. Use of AI in evidence generation: NICE position statement | Our research work | What we do | About | NICE
9. The AI opportunity: How payers can capture it now, McKinsey, June 2024. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare/our-insights/the-ai-opportunity-how-payers-can-capture-it-now
Cencora.com is providing automated translations to assist in reading the website in languages other than English. For these translations, reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation, however, no automated translation is perfect nor is it intended to replace human translators. These translations are provided as a service to users of Cencora.com and are provided "as is." No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of any of these translations made from English into any other language. Some content (such as images, videos, Flash, etc.) may not be accurately translated due to the limitations of the translation software.
Any discrepancies or differences created in translating this content from English into another language are not binding and have no legal effect for compliance, enforcement, or any other purpose. If any errors are identified, please contact us. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in these translations, please refer to the English version of the page.