Article

The complex path to meeting promotional materials requirements in Europe

  • Andy Harbrow headshot

    Andy Harbrow

  • Anne Soikkeli headshot

    Anne Soikkeli

  • Katharina Stapler-Cebulla headshot

    Katharina Stapler-Cebulla

Promotional campaigns are important to a pharmaceutical product’s commercial success. However, as with every part of the industry, it is tightly regulated. What makes the framework around the promotion of prescription medicines particularly difficult in Europe is that, despite there being an overarching European code governing promotional practices, how it is applied differs significantly from one country to the next.
Business
Business
From a regulatory perspective, Art. 98 of Directive 2001/83/EC covers the advertising and promotion of medicinal products. In addition, industry bodies have codes of practice that companies are expected to adhere to. Key among these is the code of practice from the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA).

The code’s four principles – care, fairness, honesty, and respect – apply to the promotion of prescription-only medicines to healthcare professionals (HCPs) and to interactions with HCPs, healthcare organizations, and patient groups.

The person responsible for approving a company’s promotional materials is also expected to have certain qualifications, which are specific to each country – a huge challenge for companies not familiar with the European market. 
Business

While the EFPIA code on product promotion imposes strict ethical standards on industry, it is just the start for companies seeking to bring their products to European markets. To highlight just how varied country-specific promotional requirements are, this article will explore how promotional materials and interactions with HCPs are managed and regulated in three different European markets.

The UK: A dual approach to oversight

For companies promoting medicines in the UK, there are two routes of regulation: through a self-regulated system or through the MHRA. Additionally, before even starting a promotional materials campaign in the UK, companies must ensure the information has been approved by a qualified signatory and that the material is in its final form.1

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has committed to vetting any initial advertising for new active substances. Vetting by MHRA may also be required where a product is reclassified or where previous advertising has breached the regulations. Companies that are self-regulating must comply with the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) Code of Practice, which is administered by the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA).2,3 Companies found in breach of the ABPI Code must undertake to cease the practice and must pay an administrative charge. Other more serious actions may be taken if the PMCPA deems it necessary.

Those who are not ABPI members or who have not provided written confirmation that they will abide by the jurisdiction of the PMCPA will be dealt with by MHRA if there is a complaint about any misleading advertising for a medicine.5 Additionally, the MHRA will deal with repeated breaches or where self-regulation fails. The sanctions available to the MHRA vary but can be legally based and company directors may incur personal liability.6

While self-regulation is widely accepted, there are processes that need to be followed, including legal liability for company directors, and so it might not always make sense for small companies that are new to the market. Another code requirement for companies operating in the UK is to ensure their sales representatives are properly trained and, if they are new to the industry, require them to sit an examination within a year, and pass it within two years.7 To navigate these complexities, companies may choose to seek a partner to provide standard operating procedures and to train representatives in the ABPI requirements. 
Technologies in healthcare

The Nordics: Five distinct markets

It is common for companies new to the Nordics to assume that if they are aligned with the EFPIA Code and the ABPI Code they will have few problems. This is far from the truth. In fact, Nordics countries are stricter in many aspects than many other markets. In addition, each country has its own rules and regulations. For example, even the definition of an HCP differs across markets. In Finland, only physicians, dentists, veterinarians, and pharmacists are considered to be HCPs,8 whereas in Denmark the definition is expansive, including pharmaceutical economists, nurses and midwives, radiographers, and clinical dietitians.9 These differences matter because companies may only market prescription medicines to HCPs.

Members of EFPIA local associations are bound by the self-regulatory system in each Nordic country. In Sweden, members of the Swedish Association of the Pharmaceutical Industry (LIF) are required to have a compliance officer and to submit all materials to LIF, who will make random checks and possibly fine companies for any breaches.10 
As with all the other European countries, Nordic countries require that all materials are in accordance with the latest summary of product characteristics (SPC). However, the nuances as to what this means in practice causes confusion for many companies. Sweden has been particularly strict on this issue and has long prevented companies from including much additional information, though we are starting to see a shift to a less rigid approach and more in keeping with other Nordic markets, such as including long-term treatment results. 

Other complexities facing companies new to the Nordics are differences between which countries will accept abstracts and posters in substantiating claims and which won’t, and in what circumstances. 

Regulatory oversight again varies by market. In Finland, for example, members of Pharma Industry Finland (PIF) are self-regulated and those that breach the local code may face fines. Companies that are not members of the local industry bodies will be regulated by the regulatory authorities, such as Fimea in Finland.11

Given these complexities, companies need to consider their Nordic launch very carefully and seek advice if they are new to these markets. 
Computer screen with graphs

Germany:

Promotional materials compliance is mainly covered by two laws in Germany: The Medicinal Products Advertising Act (HWG)  and the German medicines act (AMG).13 The first applies to the requirements around advertising, while the second covers the tasks of the responsible person, known as the Information Officer, for approving and monitoring promotional or advertising material and any information shared with HCPs and the public, such as labeling and package insert information. 

Additionally, Germany has national self-regulatory codes of practice applied by industry bodies, which members are expected to abide by. Members can also use the code to address unfair competition. 

Germany has two self-regulation organizations: 1) the Association for Voluntary Self-Regulation for the Pharmaceutical Industry (FSA), which was founded by the Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Manufacturers (vfa);14 and 2) the AKG.15 Member companies of BPI, the German Pharmaceutical Industry Association, are typically members of FSA.  
Companies that are not members of either must follow the compliance process for review and oversight of their promotional materials and communications with HCPs as outlined in the local regulation.  

One of the challenges for companies with medicinal products on the market in Germany is that the advertising regulation is not specific, which puts the onus on the Information Officer to understand and interpret the regulations, ensuring materials are in compliance with the laws and the codes. There are no specific qualifications written in the law for the Information Officer. It is up to the company to ensure the person has the right knowledge and reliability required to perform their duties.13 Since no one person can have insight and oversight of all activities, it is the responsibility of the Information Officer to ensure there are processes in place to manage oversight of relevant company activities. 

Further complicating the landscape is that Germany has a federal system with 16 federal states. For example, some local (federal) authorities may require companies to provide an explanation as to why they deem the Information Officer to be suitable for the role. 

Given the highly complex and heterogeneous nature of the German market, it is important that companies have local knowledge and expertise to navigate the different codes and requirements. 

Conclusion

The country-specific nature of promotional materials compliance requirements makes it very difficult for companies new to Europe to navigate the process on their own. Without local presence, it is next to impossible to understand the nuances of each market, even with a deep understanding of the EFPIA code. 

Unlike the United States, Europe does not have a single approach to promotional materials, even within the European Union. There are numerous examples of companies that have fallen foul of local requirements and the consequences can be dire, including extensive audit by the self-regulatory body or vetting of materials by the health authorities. Having local support in Europe and ensuring rigorous training of your local representatives is therefore vital. 

About the authors:

Andy Harbrow is Associate Director, Promotional Materials and Compliance, with more than 25 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry. He is a UK medical signatory.

Anne Soikkeli is Associate Director, Team Lead PMC Nordics and has over 10 years of experience on Nordic marketing compliance, both in the pharmaceutical industry and in consultancy.

Katharina Stapler-Cebulla is Associate Director, Team Lead Promotional Materials and Compliance DACH, with more than 15 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry and consultancy, mainly focused on marketing compliance.


Disclaimer:
The information provided in this article does not constitute legal advice. Cencora, Inc., strongly encourages readers to review available information related to the topics discussed and to rely on their own experience and expertise in making decisions related thereto.

 


Connect with our team

Our team of leading value experts is dedicated to transforming evidence, policy insights, and market intelligence into effective global market access strategies. Let us help you navigate today’s complex healthcare landscape with confidence. Reach out to discover how we can support your goals.

Sources:

1. The Blue Guide: Advertising and Promotion of Medicines in the UK, MHRA, 2020. BG_2020_Brexit_Final_version.pdf
2. How we fit with other regulatory bodies, PMCPA. How we fit with other regulatory bodies
3. Clause 8 Certification and Examination, PMCPA. Clause 8 Certification and Examination
4. Sanctions, PMCPA. Sanctions
5. Report misleading medicines advertisements, MHRA. Report misleading medicines advertisements - GOV.UK
6. Guidance on the vetting of promotional material for medicines, 2023. Vetting_Guidance_Updated_June_2023.pdf
7. The ABPI Examination for Industry Personnel, ABPI. The ABPI Examination for Industry Personnel
8. Pharma Industry Finland Code of Ethics 2024. pharma-industry-finland_code-of-ethics_2023_20240115_v1-2.pdf
9. The Danish Ethical Rules for Promotion of Medicinal Products towards Healthcare Professionals, ENLI. https://www.enli.dk/media/25238/guidance-on-the-danish-hcp-code-ver112-en.pdf 
10. Ethical rules for the pharmaceutical industry in Sweden, revised June 2022, LIF. https://www.lif.se/globalassets/etik/dokument/ler-english-version-2022-07-01-mark-up-changes.pdf
11. Advertising of medicinal products, Finnish Medicines Agency (Fimea). Advertising of medicinal products - Fimea
12. Act on Advertising in the Field of Healthcare (Therapeutic Products Advertising Act - HWG). HWG - Act on Advertising in the Field of Healthcare
13. Act on the Circulation of Medicinal Products. AMG - unofficial table of contents
14. Transparency Code of the Pharmaceutical Industry, vfa. Pharma Code: Transparency Code of the Pharmaceutical Industry
15. AKG e. V. Kurzinfo

Related resources

Abstracts

White paper

Executive playbook: Optimizing the mature product portfolio
abstract globe

Webinar

Global outlook for eCTD 4.0 adoption: Successes and challenges
people working around a table

Article

Building revenue with mature products in a time of market flux

Cencora.com is providing automated translations to assist in reading the website in languages other than English. For these translations, reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation, however, no automated translation is perfect nor is it intended to replace human translators. These translations are provided as a service to users of Cencora.com and are provided "as is." No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of any of these translations made from English into any other language. Some content (such as images, videos, Flash, etc.) may not be accurately translated due to the limitations of the translation software.

Any discrepancies or differences created in translating this content from English into another language are not binding and have no legal effect for compliance, enforcement, or any other purpose. If any errors are identified, please contact us. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in these translations, please refer to the English version of the page.