Article

A digital journey to better local PV oversight and decision-making

  • headshot

    Iain Barnden

  • Timm Pauli

  • Headshot

    José Miguel Rivas Romero

Explore how digital capabilities can improve local pharmacovigilance oversight by reducing manual work, strengthening compliance, and enabling better-informed decision-making.
Heightened regulatory oversight of global and local pharmacovigilance (PV) poses a significant challenge for biopharmaceutical companies. Diverse country-specific requirements, managing multiple different local PV partners and processes, and the need to accurately track and report on all local PV activities place a huge burden on safety teams. 

Digital capabilities can help pharmaceutical companies move from fragmented, manual oversight toward a more connected, transparent, and progressive model that supports true end-to-end PV management. Used appropriately, technologies such as automation, artificial intelligence, workflow tools, dashboards, and digital intelligence platforms can reduce repetitive work, improve data quality, strengthen compliance evidence, and support faster, better-informed decision-making.
By combining digital capabilities with experienced pharmacovigilance professionals, companies can gain greater visibility, consistency, scalability, and operational confidence across local and global PV activities, while allowing the adaptability and agility needed at the country level.

Bringing clarity and traceability to literature screening

Literature screening at the local level has long been a highly fragmented and manual process. Local PV teams must search in-country journals and identify relevant safety information, carry out quality checks, and conduct literature reconciliation and reporting. Often, each country has its own processes for managing local literature screening.  

Digital solutions enable a centralized approach, applying the same rules across the world, regardless of the language of the documents or local specifications, while still supporting locally required nuances and practices. For pharmaceutical companies, the value lies in stronger safety coverage, reduced risk of missed information, shorter cycle times, and clearer evidence of how the literature screening was performed.

What a digital approach enables is a globally controlled and harmonized process for collecting data from all these local journals, creating greater consistency across countries. 

Giving PV leaders and QPPVs insights across the workflow

One of the core objectives for biopharmaceutical companies is to centralize their PV processes as much as possible while maintaining the same level of quality and adherence to local requirements. 

This is especially important for the qualified person for pharmacovigilance (QPPV), who needs sufficient oversight of the pharmacovigilance system and must be able to access reliable information quickly.1 Digital capabilities can support the QPPV by providing a consolidated view of PV activities, open actions, metrics, deviations, literature screening status, local requirements, partner responsibilities, and inspection-relevant evidence. Instead of relying on manual updates, spreadsheets, or country-by-country follow-up, the QPPV can use structured dashboards and workflows to identify issues earlier, prioritize risk-based follow-up, and demonstrate oversight when challenged by auditors or regulators.

It also provides them with up-to-date pharmacovigilance intelligence of all global regulations and local interpretations by PV affiliates. A digital oversight and communications capability lets PV leaders raise queries about upcoming regulations and see an impact analysis of how these changes would impact their existing processes – all within a single validated, secure environment. It also makes it easier to generate key performance indicators from a centralized dashboard to have visibility into – and carry out quality checks of – the local case processing workflow. In general, this will allow PV leaders to move from reactive issue management to more proactive oversight.

Keeping track of activities and metrics

When companies face an audit or an inspection, they must be able to show the auditor that their process can be reproduced and that there is a clear audit trail. This can be particularly challenging for multi-country organizations operating within a complex standard operating procedure environment, where differences in local requirements and ways of working can limit visibility and consistency. 

By replacing manual trackers and fragmented oversight with digital workflows and centralized visibility, and by filling data gaps that are typically not gathered on central case processing or literature processing systems, companies can maintain end-to-end insight into compliance status.

For example, every month local affiliates are expected to check the information they have in their spreadsheets is accurate, such as any changes to the local person for pharmacovigilance (LPPV) or changes to contact details for key personnel. Having a digital way to keep track of this data also helps companies to ensure that key records and process evidence remain traceable and readily available for internal oversight as well as for regulators. 

Digital oversight of contracts and partners

One of the complexities biopharmaceutical companies face with managing their global and local PV responsibilities is having clear oversight of their various contracts and partnerships with local distributors and other partners. Currently, many companies that operate globally use multiple vendors in different countries, each of which collects and captures data on local spreadsheets. As such, it is labor-intensive to ensure visibility into what is happening in those different territories and demonstrate compliance with regulations and partner agreements. 

Digitalizing this oversight helps companies manage those contracts and have clarity into the responsibilities handled by those various partners; for example, how are they collecting adverse events and to whom are these being reported? 

Connect the local PV dots with digitalization

Digitalization cannot and should not remove the local dimension of pharmacovigilance. Instead, it should make local expertise more visible, better connected, and easier to apply consistently. 

What digital tools change is the way in which companies manage their PV compliance obligations. It allows them to adopt an end-to-end approach with key information available to all PV stakeholders across the organization. For instance, it removes the manual complexities of local literature screening, enables local case processing reconciliation and reporting, and allows companies to stay on top of PV intelligence region by region. In so doing, digital tools equip PV teams with validated data to help them make the right decisions, demonstrate compliance, and quickly provide the evidence auditors are looking for. 

As product portfolios expand and companies enter new markets, digital capabilities can reduce the incremental burden of adding countries, sources, partners, or requirements. The value for pharmaceutical companies comes from combining the reach and consistency of a global operating model with the insight of local specialists. This balanced model also enables companies to scale, while helping ensure this does not come at the expense of regulatory accuracy or inspection readiness. 

Disclaimer:
The information in this article is intended to inform readers about a topic related to Cencora's capabilities and is not legal or purchasing advice. Cencora, Inc. encourages readers to review the cited references in this article and use their own knowledge and experience when making decisions.
 

 

We're here to help

Connect with our team today to learn more about how Cencora is helping to shape the future of healthcare.
abstract

Related resources

Article

Harmonizing and safeguarding global and local pharmacovigilance processes

Webinar

Applying AI and analytics to improve lifecycle benefit-risk assessment
Discover the significance of ISO 9000 certification for manufacturers

White paper

Competing through complexity: Models to manage mature products